Q. A co-worker and I
are having a disagreement about product delivery procedure,
and we both think
we're right. We need to work together, but I don't think I can give
on this point. How do I get what I want without making the situation
worse? —James V.
A. You
have several issues in conflict with each other: "…we
both think we're right…We need to work together…I don't
think I can give on this point." The key to resolving any
conflict is your last statement: "How do I get what I want
without making the situation worse?" The ideal way to resolve
any disagreement is for both parties to feel they got what they
wanted: both have to feel like they've won. Otherwise, there's a
winner and a loser—and losers usually try to get even. So the
answer to your question on how to manage this conflict is to create a
solution where each person feels like a winner. That happens when you
collaborate to come up with a solution you both can live with.
The first step is to see
the other person as your partner,
not the enemy. Otherwise,
you’re
likely to interpret the
actions as negative or aggressive. It’s easy to become
defensive or negative; your bad feelings grow, and the battle is on.
And whatever you feel toward the other person—hostility or
flexibility—you communicate it. It’s harder to be hostile
and aggressive towards someone you consider a friend or partner.
What's the Issue?
Next, identify the real
source of the problem. Is it loss of face? Fear that you'll be blamed
for a costly mistake? Control (You like things done your way)? Need
for accuracy and quality? It helps if you actually write down the
problem as you see it, so you can look at the words and decide if
what you wrote accurately describes your concerns.
Now, plan ahead: know
what you want. If the outcome you want is not clear, and you can't
clearly express it, you'll be necessarily vague discussing what you
want. This is another good opportunity to write down what you want.
It helps clarify the issues, and the results you expect. Then take
the initiative to resolve the conflict. When each person waits for
the other person to bring up the issue, it invites anger,
frustration, and resentment to expand the disagreement way out of
proportion. While we’re waiting for the other person to bring
up the problem, we can easily blow it out of proportion, and assume
the other person is making devious, manipulative plans to win the
argument. So, be the first to speak out—get it on the table.
Begin with a positive
statement, then define the problem as you see it, indicating
you want to resolve it:
"Bill, we both know our jobs and usually work pretty well
together. Right now, we disagree on the best way to deliver a
product. What would you think about setting some time aside—maybe
over coffee—to talk about out a solution we can both live
with?"
Use Conflict-Handling
Tactics:
Divide the disagreement
into smaller issues, then begin with the smallest and easiest to
resolve. (There’s only one way to eat an elephant: one bite at
a time.)
Avoid personal
attacks—keep the conversational friendly and respectful.
(Remember, you’re talking with your partner.)
Take your time to resolve
the issue—if you rush it, the other person may become
defensive.
Get agreement on the
facts—and separate the facts from opinions.
Test your understanding
often with questions that clarify the issues.
Focus on the points you
agree on, not the disagreements.
Emphasize the benefits to
the other person for resolving the conflict.
Leave the other person a
way out; provide options to help save "face."
Don't immediately counter
every point. Listen for the value in the other person's ideas. Then,
when appropriate, present your viewpoint.