Q. I’ve
been asked to help interview job candidates and haven’t had
much experience interviewing. Past interviewers usually asked general
questions about my work, and I usually gave general, “safe”
responses. I think we need to probe more deeply. What do you
suggest?
—Antoinette
L.
A. The
most effective job interviewing I know is called “competency-based”
interviewing. Here, the interviewer explores the job candidate’s
skills—competencies—in all the areas required of the job
description. To do this well, start by developing questions that
probe the candidate’s ability to handle the job as described.
Focus on “open-ended” questions—those that can’t
be answered with a Yes or No or just a few words (“Was
your last job challenging?”).
Choose
opening
statements that begin with
“How…” and
“Why…” like, “How
would you…”
or “Why
did you approach that problem the way you did?”
These
are powerful and effective questions, because they make the
interviewee tell you how he’d approach, handle, deal with,
solve, etc., a situation, problem, project or challenge that’s
relevant to the job role in question. The situation you present
should focus on several aspects of the person’s career—but
always from the viewpoint of job performance—how the person
approached an aspect of the job.
For
example, you might focus on the interviewee's past experience: “How
did you handle it when…?” “Tell me about your
reactions when….happened.”
Or it could be a hypothetical scenario: “Suppose
you were given a quality control assignment and two or three people
on your team were clearly cutting corners, jeopardizing the quality
control. How would you handle that situation?”
It could also be a real situation that you know from experience is
likely to occur in the organization. “Some
of our managers have lines of authority that overlap—sometimes
for good reasons and sometimes not so good. It’s possible that
you could find yourself in a situation where you get conflicting
directions from the two managers. Tell me how you’d handle
this.”
Objectivity
a Must
You have to work hard to
weigh the answers objectively. Avoid the temptation to project your
own style and feelings into the assessment of whether the answer is
good or bad.
Ask
yourself: “How
does this answer relate to the job? To her performing it well? To his
ability to fit in with our style and culture?”
Look for the candidate’s
thoughtfulness; her ability to organize her ideas and express them
clearly; his ability to apply his skills in a practical way; her
ability to think and link a cause with an effect. The candidate may
not approach the problem the same way you would, but he may have a
perfectly effective style and approach just the same. The answers
will indicate the interviewee's approach, work style, experience and
competency in relation to the scenario you presented. If you weigh
their answers carefully, you’ll be able to project how well
they get things done, and also the style they use to do it.
Hide
Your Biases
It’s
important to keep your behavior biases private, so you won’t
influence a candidate’s answers. For example, if you’re
decisive and hard-driving, a sensitive candidate may easily spot it
and adapt his answers so your biases (this is called “mirroring.”)
If you know you’re the kind of person who easily reveals
behavior preferences, try to ask questions in such a way that will
minimize this. Don’t lean forward with an eager smile on your
face and spit out, “Tell
me how you handled this.”
When you do this, you’re really saying, “I
like a no-nonsense, take-no-prisoners approach. I’ll like it if
you’re that way, too.”
When you do this, your questions may seem
to probe for a competency, while in fact you’re really looking
for an affirmation of your behavior style. Bad idea.
You’ll
also be tempted to respond positively to a candidate whose behavior
pattern closely matches yours. If you’re a dominant,
high-achiever, you’ll be tempted to hire the candidate on the
spot if she says, “I
focus on what needs to be done to achieve the task, to get the job
done, to cut through the red tape and peripherals, ignoring the
distractions, etc. I like a strong incentive, encouragement, clear,
firm expectations and timescales, deliverables…”
Most of us like to associate with people who are most like us, and
candidates know this.
In short, the more you’re
a balanced, mature, non-judgmental interviewer, the more likely
you’ll be able to assess confidence, maturity, integrity,
flexibility, compassion, tolerance and other traits in a candidate.
And the better you’ll be able to choose the right candidate for
the right job.
: